June 10, 2005

PRODUCTION TIMES PRICE
By John Q. Pridger

"Production times price" equals income in a real economy.

If a farmer isn't able to sell his produce at a price that enables him to return to the field the following year, somebody is going to end up going hungry. If a fisherman cannot sell his fish for at least a living wage, his boat will end up rotting on the shore. If General Motors can't sell cars at a tidy markup, neither the autoworkers nor stockholders will be happy campers.

Production times Price is the key to all productive business activities. It has alway been that way, and always will be. But, nonetheless, things have changed radically in America. The equation has been thrown out of balance and the people into confusion. The production-consumption game only works to everybody's benefit within a closed economy -- i.e., one in which the producer and the consumer are on the same team (are, in fact, one in the same), and where it is desirable for industrial corporations to pay their workers well enough to consume their own production so both the workers and stockholders remain happy.

The farmers were sold out over half a century ago. During the last quarter century the industrial labor force has gradually been sold out. Today white collar and technical workers are being sold out too. All the while, everybody is being told they are going up the river to a brighter, more prosperous future. Cheap food and cheap consumer goods have been the bait. We took it, hook, line, and sinker, and hardly anybody yet realizes that, we've been sold down the river. But we have been.

Today, the "production times price" formula pays Chinese workers what they might consider a decent living wage. It pays the corporate hierarchies and stockholders, but not the American worker. He gets his benefits at the Wal-Mart check-out counter -- if he's lucky enough to have any money to spend.

When the production facilities providing all the essential goodies are on the other side of the world "production times price" is no longer a relevant economic equation for anybody other than the corporations that profit from low wage labor.

Today we hear that we have transcended real economics and are in what is called a "service" and even an "information" economy. Services and information are valuable enough, of course, but there's not one person in three billion who can subsist on a strict diet of service or information alone. Nobody can eat them, live in either, or drive them down the road, or put them in their fuel tank.

As always, those lucky enough to have good paying jobs in service and information fields have to depend on others to provide the basics of life. They need food and all of the things required to make life bearable or enjoyable. Somebody else has to produce those things for them. Without food or shelter, or the wherewithal to get to work, service and information jobs are about as promising as snowballs lined up on the crest of a Saharan sand dune.

To listen to the Washington brain trust, and the economists and others who pull their strings and create our current excuse for national industrial and economic policy, one would think that before long everybody in America will be rolling in money peddling services and information. It's the wave of the future, they say -- if, for example, we can get CAFTA passed, or China to revalue the Yuan.

They would have us trust and believe that Mexicans, Chinese, Koreans, Japanese, Indians, Bangladeshis, and Indonesians are going to fulfill our material needs from now on. We Americans are all going to be service and information people.

Well, so far, so good. America is still an amazingly prosperous place (at least if you ignore the mushrooming public and private debt, not to mention the trade deficit). Two or three generations of Americans have grown to adulthood without ever knowing what hunger is. Most are over weight. America believes it's so rich that it can continue to be the most incredibly wasteful nation in the history of civilization -- and be that way in perpetuity. Even the poorest classes among us engage in conspicuous over-consumption and waste. Our solid waste landfills are the envy of the world.

What's more, our leaders continue to think that we can make the rest of the world just as spectacularly materialistic, prosperous, and wasteful as we are. How? By turning the our collective national and global future over to the stewardship of giant multi-national corporations. They, with the license to exploit the earth through the global free market system, are the key to universal prosperity and happiness.

The terror menace now preoccupying our leadership is nothing compared to what actually faces us as a nation and global civilization.

Return to Backlog Index.